1a5d6de0d4
Conceptually, it doesn't make sense for a thread to be able to persist the lifetime of a scheduler. A scheduler should be taking care of the threads; the threads should not be taking care of the scheduler. If the threads outlive the scheduler (or we simply don't actually terminate/shutdown the threads), then it should be considered a bug that we need to fix. Attributing this to balika011, as they opened #1317 to attempt to fix this in a similar way, but my refactoring of the kernel code caused quite a few conflicts. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| kernel | ||
| service | ||
| ipc.h | ||
| ipc_helpers.h | ||
| lock.cpp | ||
| lock.h | ||
| result.h | ||