mes/ANNOUNCE
2016-10-10 23:24:44 +02:00

46 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext

Subject: on bootstrapping: introducing Mes
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 13:08:02 +0200
Hi,
I have a minimal LISP-1.5-resembling interpreter in C that now can
also interpret itself
https://gitlab.com/janneke/mes
It was inspired by the seemingly often ignored bootstrapping question
made so painfully visible by GuixSD and by OriansJ with their self
hosting hex assembler project.
As a next step after a hex assembler I was thinking of getting Scheme up
and running and use that to create a tiny C compiler, probably using
PEG. For that I think we need define-syntax, which I had a peek at and
still scares the all-sorts-of-things out of me :-)
I searched for minimal Lisp/Scheme to get that going and found an
article called the Maxwell Equations of Software 1) with a pointer to
the 1962 LISP 1.5 paper by John McCarthy 2).
First I `implemented' Mes/LISP-1.5: the bottom half of page 13 and the
necessary helper procedures defined on pages 8-12 using Guile, removing
all but the primitives needed to run LISP-1.5/Mes (I think): car, cdr,
cond, cons, define, eq?, '()/nil, null?, pair? and quote. I cheated
with read, and with display and newline for debugging.
Then I translated the program into C and got rid of read by using
getchar/ungetchar.
It's been great fun and now I'm kind of stuck a bit at the point of
implementing macros. I have a simplistic version in C but want to
remove that again --I like the idea of having the absolute minimal LISP
interpreter in C-- and only introduce macros after having bootstrapped
into the LISP/Mes domain.
Greetings,
Jan
1) http://www.michaelnielsen.org/ddi/lisp-as-the-maxwells-equations-of-software/
2)
http://www.softwarepreservation.org/projects/LISP/book/LISP%201.5%20Programmers%20Manual.pdf